RFC : Authentication and secret management #5

Open
opened 2025-03-10 04:28:09 +00:00 by johnride · 1 comment
Owner

See ADR 006 Secre Management

To be discussed here.

Two main discussion points :

  • Should we provide this functionality of secret management built into Harmony?
  • Is keycloak the tool of choice for this job in our context?
See [ADR 006 Secre Management](https://git.nationtech.io/NationTech/harmony/src/branch/master/adr/006-secret-management.md) To be discussed here. Two main discussion points : - Should we provide this functionality of secret management built into Harmony? - Is keycloak the tool of choice for this job in our context?
johnride added the
RFC
Architecture Decision Record
labels 2025-03-10 04:29:50 +00:00
Owner

All the projects I've been working on in the past have secrets to manage. A project that doesn't have secrets is probably very small and simple, so not a customer target anyway.

I don't have experience with Keycloak. The only thing that bother me is that the main goal of KC is not to manager secrets, so I would be a bit worry to use a tool for something it's not expressively designed for.

All the projects I've been working on in the past have secrets to manage. A project that doesn't have secrets is probably very small and simple, so not a customer target anyway. I don't have experience with Keycloak. The only thing that bother me is that the main goal of KC is not to manager secrets, so I would be a bit worry to use a tool for something it's not expressively designed for.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: NationTech/harmony#5
No description provided.